mercredi 28 octobre 2009

Vet: U.S. Presence Fuels Afghan Insurgents

State Department Official Resigns in Protest over Afghan "Misadventure"; Calls Justifications for U.S. Bloodshed "Specious"

  • Play CBS VideoVIDEOU.S. Official Resigns over War

    Matthew Hoh, a former Marine who has worked at the State Department, has emerged as the first U.S. official to resign from his post in opposition to the war in Afghanistan. David Martin reports.

    • Saying that PHOTO

      Saying that "the United States military presence in Afghanistan greatly contributes to the legitimacy and strategic message of the Pashtun insurgency," Matthew Hoh – an Iraq War combat veteran and State Department officer Afghanistan – became the first U.S. official to resign in protest over the Afghan war. (CBS)

    • PHOTO ESSAYPhotos from Afghanistan

      Cpl. Jason Bogar's pictures of Afghanistan

    • PHOTO ESSAYAfghanistan Disabled

      The Red Cross orthopedic center in Kabul provides new limbs, wheelchairs and physical therapy for the victims of war and conflict.

    (CBS) The White House said Tuesday President Obama isalmost finished gathering advice on how to move forward in Afghanistan. A decision is still expected in the coming weeks.

    The question is whether to send in thousands of additional troops. But CBS News correspondent David Martin reports one combat veteran and former State Department official says the U.S. should get out of Afghanistan altogether.

    Charging that "the United States military presence in Afghanistan greatly contributes to the legitimacy and strategic message of the (Taliban) insurgency," Matthew Hoh became the first U.S. official toresign in protest over the Afghan war.

    Read Hoh's resignation letter

    "Basically I feel that our strategies in Afghanistan are not pursuing goals that are worthy of sacrificing our young men and women or spending the billions were doing there," Hoh said.

    Hoh is a former marine who spent five months working for the State Department in Afghanistan and is by all accounts well respected.

    In his letter of resignation, dated Sept. 10, he said, "Our forces, devoted and faithful, have been committed to conflict in an indefinite and unplanned manner that has become a cavalier, politically expedient and pollyannish misadventure."

    One of his specific complaints is sending troops to man outposts in the remote valleys of Afghanistan.

    "I don't believe we should be conducting combat operations in valleys where the only reason those people are fighting us is because we're occupying them," Hoh said.

    Often located on valley floors surrounded by mountains - and able to be resupplied only by helicopter - those outposts are frequently attacked by Taliban from the high ground. Helicopter gun ships have to be called in to repulse the attacks.

    This month U.S. troops have pulled out of a half dozen outposts in eastern Afghanistan. The withdrawals were ordered by Maj. Gen. Curtis Scaparotti, who told CBS News it freed up hundreds of soldiers tied down defending terrain where many of the villagers just want to be left alone.

    But every time the U.S. abandons an outpost, it's a propaganda victory

    Top 20 videos: Watch and vote


    Organizing for America
    Dear friend's of Lyon's support commettee --

    We just finished going through the submissions to OFA's Health Reform Video Challenge, and they're great. There are personal stories that grab your heart, brilliant summaries of what reform would really mean, and plenty of biting satire that calls out the insurance lobbyists.

    Out of nearly a thousand excellent videos submitted, we're down to the top 20. Now it's your turn to watch the finalists and vote for your favorites -- and then we'll air the winner on national television.

    Watch and vote on the finalists now.

    Watch and vote

    The top 20 ads will also be voted on by our panel of experts and artists, including Black Eyed Peas frontman will.i.am, animator and director Seth MacFarlane, actress Kate Walsh, Obama for America campaign manager David Plouffe, and Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine.

    It couldn't be more urgent for us to get these funny, powerful, and eye-opening messages out to the public. As the full Congress begins its final debate on reform, airing the winning video as an ad on national television could help tip the balance toward enacting the changes they've been talking about for years in Washington.

    Polls close at midnight on Friday, November 6th, so don't waste a minute: Watch the finalists and vote for your favorites right away:

    http://my.barackobama.com/VideoChallenge

    Thanks, and go get started,

    Natalie

    Natalie Foster
    New Media Director

    P.S. -- Help spread the word: After you vote, make sure you send this on to friends and family so they can check out the finalists.

    http://my.barackobama.com/VideoChallenge


    NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. MAKING A CONTRIBUTION WILL NOT INCREASE ODDS OF WINNING. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Contest open only to U.S. citizens who are legal residents of the 50 United States and District of Columbia and 18 or older (or of majority in entrant's state). Contest starts 12:01 AM ET on 9/26/09 and ends 11:59 PM ET on 10/18/09. Winners will be selected by 11/7/09 and notified by phone and/or e-mail by 11/9/09. One winner will receive the following prize: all or part of the winner's video may be used in a TV ad associated with DNC's health reform campaign (approximate retail value: $0). Twenty finalists will be selected by a panel of judges comprised of DNC employees; the winner will be selected by public voters and a panel of experts. Entries will be judged on the following criteria: the most apt, creative, original and interesting video; demonstrated impact concerning supporting health insurance reform; and clarity of message concerning supporting health insurance reform. Odds of winning depend on the number and quality of eligible entries received. Contest subject to Official Rules. To enter, create an original 30-second video supporting health insurance reform, upload the video to http://www.youtube.com, and complete the entry form at http://www.barackobama.com/videochallenge. For full details, restrictions and Official Rules, visit http://www.barackobama.com/videochallenge. Sponsor: Democratic National Committee, Inc., 430 South Capitol Street SE, Washington, D.C. 20003.

    mardi 13 octobre 2009

    Two State Races May Put Lens on Obama


    Published: October 11, 2009

    LEESBURG, Va. — When President Obama captured the White House nearly a year ago, his victory in Virginia was, for many Democrats, one of the most heartening moments of the night.

    Brendan Smialowski for The New York Times

    In Virginia, Robert F. McDonnell, center, a Republican, holds a nine-point lead over R. Creigh Deeds, a Democrat.

    Blog

    The Caucus
    The Caucus

    The latest on President Obama, the new administration and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.

    Associated Press

    R. Creigh Deeds campaigning in Arlington, Va.

    He was the first Democratic presidential candidate to win this state since 1964, assembling a coalition — independent voters, economically distressed rural Democrats and blacks — that his party saw as evidence that it could take and hold Republican-leaning areas across the nation.

    But things are different today. At a time when Mr. Obama’s national approval ratings have declined, a Democratic candidate for governor, R. Creigh Deeds, is struggling to keep Virginia in the Democratic column.

    The strong sentiment against George W. Bush that reverberated throughout this state one year ago has dissipated; Mr. Obama’s policies have become a flash point for Mr. Deeds’s Republican opponent, Robert F. McDonnell, who has used it to draw independents to his camp.

    There are two big elections in 2009 — the contest for governor here and one in New Jersey where Gov. Jon Corzine, a Democrat, is struggling to survive in a spirited three-way race.

    Off-year elections are prone to overinterpretation, and governor’s races tend to be determined by the quality of the candidates and local issues rather than national politics; overcrowded highways are the biggest topic this year in Virginia.

    For all that, Virginia, a laboratory for many of the ways Mr. Obama tried to change the ideological appeal and tactics of his party, is looming as an early if imprecise test of this president and his policies.

    It is measuring the ability of Mr. Obama to build a coalition and hold it together during tough political battles in Washington. It could be an early gauge of whether Mr. Obama and his party have now taken political ownership of the rising unemployment rate and the continued sense of economic anxiety that he used a year ago to the advantage of Democrats. Most ominously, it is signaling the problem Democrats might have in the midterm Congressional elections next year with independent voters, upset with Mr. Obama over increasing deficits and his advocacy of big-government programs.

    A White House that has shown no hesitation to delve into state races — Mr. Obama is planning to make at least one more trip to New Jersey on behalf of Mr. Corzine, aides said — has been struggling to figure out how to deal with Virginia. Mr. Deeds’s aides have pleaded with the White House to send Mr. Obama into the state; it has yet to agree.

    “The most precious commodity we have is the president’s time, and we have to appropriate it on a rational basis between now and Election Day,” said David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Mr. Obama.

    Their apprehension was underscored on Friday after The Washington Post published a poll showing that Mr. McDonnell’s lead over Mr. Deeds had expanded in recent weeks to nine percentage points, 53 percent to 44 percent. A month earlier, Mr. McDonnell had led by 4 points.

    Among independent voters, Mr. Deeds trailed Mr. McDonnell by 21 points in a recent poll.

    Mr. Obama’s advisers argued that it would be a mistake to draw any national lessons from Virginia. Democrats won races for governor in both Virginia and New Jersey in 2001, and Mr. Bush went on to win re-election easily in 2004. And for more than 30 years, the party that has won the White House has in the following year lost the Virginia governor’s seat.

    “I would just hesitate to make sweeping judgments about what does this mean in the here and now in terms of health care, and also the 2010 Congressional races in both states and the 2012 presidential election,” said David Plouffe, who was Mr. Obama’s campaign manager.

    But Mr. McDonnell said in an interview that one reason he was doing so well was that Mr. Deeds was paying a price for what Democrats were doing in Washington.

    “There are blocs of independent voters that are being driven over — or inclined to support me — because they are very concerned about these federal policies: its spending and the new intrusions into the free enterprise system,” Mr. McDonnell said. “Those voters probably leaned toward President Obama in the last cycle. But when voters see specifics —cap and trade, card check, unfunded mandates — I think some bloc of voters said, ‘This is not the change we thought we are getting, and because we are fiscally conservative, we are going to take another look at the Republican candidate for governor.’ ”

    Nick Ayres, the executive director of the Republican Governors Association, which has spent over $5 million here to try to put Virginia back in the Republican column, said Mr. Obama and his party would certainly suffer damage should Mr. Deeds lose. “This is a state that Obama won by seven points,” he said, adding: “They don’t want this to be their Olympics Part II.”

    In New Jersey, Mr. Corzine is struggling in his bid for re-election against Christopher J. Christie. A Democratic loss there would be an embarrassment for this White House and provide a jolt of energy to a Republican Party at a crucial time, as it is recruiting candidates and raising money for the midterm elections. Republicans in 1993 won the governors’ races in New Jersey and Virginia and went on to capture Congress in 1994.

    However, because of Mr. Corzine’s deep unpopularity in that state, it is not as clear that a Democratic defeat there would offer lessons that go beyond New Jersey.

    In Virginia, Mr. Deeds has made efforts to put some distance between himself and Mr. Obama, including saying he was not an Obama Democrat. In an interview, he said his difficulties to date were the result of the tough economy. The current governor, Tim Kaine, is a Democrat who is barred from seeking re-election because of term limits.

    “Right now, the economy is in tough shape, and they are seeing these elections through those lenses,” Mr. Deeds said. “People are concerned about the economy, and that is our headwind.”

    Still, Mr. Deeds seems ambivalent about the president, inviting him to campaign here even as he places at least some of the blame for his troubles on what Democrats are doing in Washington.

    Mr. Deeds said that Democrats should not be overly confident about Virginia and suggested that in some ways, Mr. Obama had enjoyed a unique success, given his particular appeal.

    “With so much economic turmoil, Barack Obama was a hope agent,” he said. “He’s a leader and dealer in hope. A merchant of hope.”

    “He was here once, and I expect him to come back again,” Mr. Deeds said.


    President Obama Presents a Night of Astronomy

    lundi 12 octobre 2009

    Weekly Address: New Momentum for Health Reform

    President Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize

    Nobel Committee Shocks World by Awarding Obama's "Extraordinary" Diplomacy Less than 1 Year into 1st Term

    • VIDEOPolitics of Obama's Nobel Win

      Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer and Chief White House correspondent Chip Reid discuss what President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize win means for American politics.

    • VIDEOUnplugged: Translating Obama's Nobel Win

      CBS News' National Security Analyst Juan Zarate and Brookings Presidential Scholar Stephen Hess speak to Bob Schieffer about President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize; Plus: the Dalai Lama visits D.C.

    • President Obama delivers a statement regarding Iran in this Oct. 1, 2009, file photo, taken in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House in Washington.PHOTO

      President Obama delivers a statement regarding Iran in this Oct. 1, 2009, file photo, taken in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House in Washington. (CBS)

    • FAST FACTSNobel Notables

      Some curious facts about the Nobel Prizes.

    • PHOTOSNobel Prize in Pictures

      Images from the awards for the world's best in science, economics, literature and peacemaking

    (CBS/AP) Updated at 11:15 a.m. Eastern.

    President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.

    The committee said Mr. Obama's efforts to promote a "global response to global challenges" cemented their decision.

    CBS News White House correspondent Peter Maer reports that White House press secretary Robert Gibbs emailed a one-word reaction to the news Friday morning: "Wow."

    The White House was clearly just as shocked by the announcment as the reporters gathered in Oslo, reports Maer.

    It was Gibbs who eventually told Mr. Obama he had won the prestigious Prize - about 45 minutes after the announcement at 6 a.m. EDT, reports CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante.

    The committee praised Mr. Obama's effort to create a "new international climate" of diplomacy.

    Obama 'Humbled' by Nobel Prize
    Politics of Obama's Nobel Win
    Unplugged: Translating Obama's Nobel Win
    Nobel Peace Prize Photos
    Obama: Nobel Prize a "Call To Action"
    Analysis: Nobel Peace Prize Doesn't Help Obama
    Obama's Next "Most Important Speech"
    Obama's Nobel Win: A "Mission Accomplished" Moment?Nobel Peace Prize Shocks Bloggers: "This is Insane"
    DNC: Republicans Siding With Terrorists on Nobel Prize
    Nobel Prize: Placing a Wager on Peace
    Nobel Notables
    What's Your Opinion?

    CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller reports that Mr. Obama is only the third U.S. President to win the Nobel Peace Prize while still in office. Theodore Roosevelt won it in 1906 and Woodrow Wilson in 1919.

    Former President Jimmy Carter also won the prize in 2002, addsKnoller, but that was more than two decades after he left office.

    Defending their surprising decision, the committee chairman said they sought not just to reward the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, but to "enhance" the recipient's actions - to promote peace.

    "We do hope that this can contribute a little bit to enhance what he is trying to do."

    "It is a clear statement to the world that we want to advocate and promote," the efforts undertaken by Mr. Obama.

    "Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," Thorbjoern Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Committee said. "In the past year Obama has been a key person for important initiatives in the U.N. for nuclear disarmament and to set a completely new agenda for the Muslim world and East-West relations."

    He added that the committee endorsed "Obama's appeal that 'Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges."'

    Mr. Obama's name had been mentioned in speculation before the award but many Nobel watchers believed it was too early to award the president.

    "The Prize has to be seen as a political statement by the Nobel committee - meant to hail the change in U.S. policy represented by President Obama's approach to foreign policy as opposed to that of his predecessor George W. Bush," says Knoller, who notes that Mr. Obama took office less than 10 days before the Feb. 1 deadline for Nobel Prize nominations.

    "This is a Prize meant as an expression of hope that President Obama's speeches and policy statements will translate into actual accomplishments," adds Knoller. "The Prize is honoring an expression of aspirations for peace, rather the achievement of it."

    Did U.S. President Barack Obama deserve to win the Nobel Peace Prize?
    Yes
    No
    Unsure



    That decision by the Nobel Committee, however, is a caluclated risk. Knoller says the members may be discredited for awarding the Prize for aspirations, rather than accomplishments.

    "I don't think anybody expected this," CBS News chief Washington correspondent and "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer said on Friday's "Early Show". In his mind, the prize decision was more of a commentary on the previous administration than the current U.S. President.

    "It's almost as if they're saying, 'We're giving you this prize for winning the election,'" said Schieffer.

    The committee said it attached special importance to Mr. Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

    "Obama has as president created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play."

    In his 1895 will, Alfred Nobel stipulated that the peace prize should go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses."

    Unlike the other Nobel Prizes, which are awarded by Swedish institutions, he said the peace prize should be given out by a five-member committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament. Sweden and Norway were united under the same crown at the time of Nobel's death.

    The committee has taken a wide interpretation of Nobel's guidelines, expanding the prize beyond peace mediation to include efforts to combat poverty, disease and climate change.

    © MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 President Barack Obama

    The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009

    The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

    Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

    Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population.

    For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges."

    Oslo, October 9, 2009

    President Barack Obama : "Not the first, but the last"

    Dear friends of Lyon's support committee--

    This morning, Michelle and I awoke to some surprising and humbling news. At 6 a.m., we received word that I'd been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009.

    To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize -- men and women who've inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.

    But I also know that throughout history the Nobel Peace Prize has not just been used to honor specific achievement; it's also been used as a means to give momentum to a set of causes.

    That is why I've said that I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations and all peoples to confront the common challenges of the 21st century. These challenges won't all be met during my presidency, or even my lifetime. But I know these challenges can be met so long as it's recognized that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.

    This award -- and the call to action that comes with it -- does not belong simply to me or my administration; it belongs to all people around the world who have fought for justice and for peace. And most of all, it belongs to you, the men and women of America, who have dared to hope and have worked so hard to make our world a little better.

    So today we humbly recommit to the important work that we've begun together. I'm grateful that you've stood with me thus far, and I'm honored to continue our vital work in the years to come.

    Thank you,

    President Barack Obama

    dimanche 27 septembre 2009

    Health reform video challenge

    Organizing for America
    Patrice --

    In many ways, the fight for health insurance reform comes down to a battle over information. The more people know about how broken the system is and the President's plan to fix it, the more they want change. But there are an awful lot of lies to cut through, and a whole lot of truth to get out.

    So today, we're proud to announce a powerful new way for you to help: Organizing for America's Health Reform Video Challenge.

    This is your chance -- you ingenious, insightful, funny people out there -- to make a 30-second ad telling the story about why the status quo has got to go, or explaining how the Obama plan will ensure we get the secure, quality care we need without breaking the budget.

    The top submissions will be voted on by the public and a panel of experts, with the winning ad aired on national television. This is your opportunity to add your voice and creativity to the debate, get some great exposure for your work, and make a huge difference.

    Click here to get started.
    Get Started


    No experience is needed -- if you have an idea, we want you to give it a shot. And if you know someone who is especially handy with a camera, please forward this note along right away. Just make sure you submit your ad by October 18th.

    Your video could be as simple as you talking straight into the camera, as complex as a full-blown production with a script and special effects, or anything in between.

    We're looking for serious videos: You can tell your personal story about how the broken health insurance system has affected you. You can illustrate the big picture about what's wrong now and how the President's plan will help with animations, charts, and facts.

    We're looking for funny videos: You can parody those trying to scare us into inaction (between the lying pundits and the insurance company spin doctors, they've given us some good stuff to work with).

    And we're looking for new ideas we never would have thought of but we know will blow us all away.

    We know that compelling videos can touch people in a way that words alone simply cannot. The messages that regular people put together will make a bigger difference than any false smears or slick ads the other side can dream up. And who knows -- your creative, powerful, or touching video could help tip the balance in favor of health reform.

    So go get started today!

    http://my.barackobama.com/videochallenge

    I can't wait to see what you come up with,

    Natalie

    Natalie Foster
    New Media Director

    lundi 21 septembre 2009

    Oba-Ma Kenobi Senses Disturbance in the Force

    Life Lesson #321 -- don't pick your nose when you're standing behind the President ... people will see you.

    Obama with lightsaber


    Filed under: Barack Obama, Politix

    Tags: barack obama, BarackObama, star wars, StarWars


    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/category/barack-obama/#ixzz0RgfYpl8c

    dimanche 20 septembre 2009

    Obama : This debate isn't about the race

    Weekly Address: Progress in the Global Economy

    President Obama: Warm Wishes for Rosh Hashanah

    Obama: No Higher Taxes With Health Reform

    President Says if New Medical Care Rules Are Adopted Consumers Will Get "More Bang for Their Buck"


    • VIDEORaising Taxes: Only Way To Pay

      In response to President Obama's interview with Bob Schieffer, RNC Chairman Michael Steele disagrees with his statement that taxes will not need to be raised to pay for health care reform.

    • President Barack Obama, in an interview with PHOTO

      President Barack Obama, in an interview with "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer broadcast Sunday, September 20, 2009. (White House photo)

    • SPECIAL REPORTHealth Care

      The latest news and analysis on the continuing battle over Barack Obama's health care reform plans.

    (CBS) President Obama said that he did not promise too much in terms of health care legislation and continued to defend his plan during a Friday taping of "Face the Nation" at the White House.

    The president told CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer that, in detailing his health care proposals, he is attempting to warn Americans that the federal budget cannot sustain the current system and "a lot of Americans are going to be much worse off over time."

    Schieffer asked if the president could still keep his campaign promise that there would be no additional tax on people making less than $250,000 a year, no payroll tax and no capital gains.

    "I can still keep that promise," Mr. Obama said, "because … about two thirds of what we've proposed would be from money that's already in the health care system and just being spent badly."

    "This is not me making wild assertions," he continued.

    More from "Face the Nation" (9/20/09):
    Obama: 24-Hour News Cycle Feeding Anger
    No Answer on More Troops in Afghanistan
    Obama: Moscow Move 'Bonus' of Missile Plan
    Full Transcript: Obama on 'Face the Nation'

    President Obama did admit that "we are going to have to find some additional sources of revenue" to subsidize the other third of the cost. Insurance and drug companies are going to have to pony up, he explained.

    Schieffer then asked how the additional cost to drug and insurance companies would not trickle down to Americans pocketbooks.

    "They are passing on those costs to the consumer anyway," he responded. "The difference is that they're making huge profits on it, Bob."

    By enforcing the rules and standards of care, the president said, he can assure Americans that they are getting "bang for their buck" in terms of medical treatment.

    "Let me be honest," the president told Schieffer, "with a piece of legislation this complicated and a sector of the economy that's about one-sixth of our economy, there's a reason why for the last forty years people have been talking about this and it hasn't gotten done."

    "It'

    mardi 15 septembre 2009

    Obama Clarifies Position on Tort Reform on "60 Minutes"

    (CBS)
    In his speech before Congress last week, President Obama attempted to win Republican support for his health care overhaul by agreeing to consider including medical malpractice reform in his plan. In an interview that aired on CBS' "60 Minutes" on Sunday the president shed some more light on what he meant -- and in which form he will not accept tort reform. (Read the transcript of the president's interview here.)

    Mr. Obama on Sunday clarified that he is so far not willing to consider capping malpractice judgments, a reform proposal consistently put forward by Republicans.

    "Many in this chamber -- particularly on the Republican side of the aisle -- have long insisted that reforming our medical malpractice laws can help bring down the cost of health care," the president said last Wednesday to a joint session of Congress. "Now, I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I've talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs."

    The president then announced that he was directing Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius to move forward on an initiative considered under the Bush administration to evaluate different kinds of malpractice reform through state-based demonstration projects.

    However, it is unclear at this point whether the demonstration projects will produce valuable results before a health care bill lands on the president's desk. The president has said he would like to finish health care reform this year, and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) said Sunday that Congress will pass a bill by Christmas.

    The HHS Department will be releasing details about the initiative within the next month, an HHS official told the Hotsheet, such as how much money will be authorized for the projects and the timeline for the initiative. States will be able to apply for grants for various projects.

    On Sunday, Mr. Obama discussed some of the types of malpractice reform that might be the subject of the state-based demonstration projects. However, he discounted the idea of capping medical malpractice damages.

    "What I would be willing to do is to consider any ideas out there that would actually work in terms of reducing costs, improving the quality of patient care," Mr. Obama said on "60 Minutes." "So far the evidence I've seen is that caps will not do that."

    There are a range of alternatives to consider, the president said, such as having medical experts review malpractice suits before they go to court to ensure they meet some threshold of credibility. Another idea would be to encourage, when appropriate, some form of mediated arbitration in place of lawsuits, he said.

    Those two ideas reflect an amendment, written by Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.), that was adopted in the House Energy and Commerce's health care bill -- the only medical malpractice provision that has been adopted in any of the health care reform proposals before Congress. Gordon's provision would provide incentives to states that implement a "Certificate of Merit" or "Early Offer" program.

    Yet while those two ideas represent malpractice reform advocated by a moderate Democrat, Republicans are still pushing for capping damages. Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) introduced legislation this year that would strictly limit punitive damages in medical practice cases. Punitive damages would only be awarded if it could be proven a person acted with malicious intent or deliberately failed to avoid unecessary injury. The punitive damages would be capped at $250,000. The bill would also set a statute of limitations of three years after the date of manifestation of injury or one year after the claimant discovers the injury, with certain exceptions.

    Gingrey has repeatedly introduced this bill, and in 2005 it passed in the House with strong Republican support and the approval of 14 Democrats.

    On Monday, Gingrey sent a letter to the president requesting a meeting on the issue.

    "The simple reality is that fear of ambitious lawyers and protracted legal proceedings are directly leading to the ordering of unnecessary tests which help safeguard against frivolous lawsuits, but also raise the cost of health care," he wrote.

    Mr. Obama conceded on "60 Minutes" that Democrats and Republicans may not be able to reach an agreement on the specific idea of capping damages.

    "I think there's also been philosophical issues and differences about whether or not patients who really have been subject to negligence, whether it's fair to just say to them, 'You know what? You can only get a certain amount no matter how egregious it is,'" he said. "So there's been a philosophical difference within the parties."

    Actor Patrick Swayze Dies at 57

    "Dirty Dancing" and "Ghost" Star Succumbed to Pancreatic Cancer following Two-Year Battle

    • Play CBS VideoVIDEOPatrick Swayze Dead

      Actor Patrick Swayze has died, losing his two-year battle with pancreatic cancer. The 57-year-old is remembered for his famous role in 'Dirty Dancing.' Sandra Hughes reports on the life of the influential icon.

        • Patrick Swayze and his wife Lisa Niemi attend a party at the grand opening of the Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino in Las Vegas in this Nov. 17, 2007 file photo. Swayze died Sept. 14, 2009 following a two-year battle with pancreatic cancer, a publicist said.PHOTO

          Patrick Swayze and his wife Lisa Niemi attend a party at the grand opening of the Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino in Las Vegas in this Nov. 17, 2007 file photo. Swayze died Sept. 14, 2009 following a two-year battle with pancreatic cancer, a publicist said. (AP Photo/Isaac Brekken)

        Previous slideNext slide
        • 0
        • 1
      (CBS/AP) Patrick Swayze, the hunky actor who danced his way into viewers' hearts with "Dirty Dancing" and then broke them with "Ghost," died Monday after a battle with pancreatic cancer. He was 57.

      "Patrick Swayze passed away peacefully today with family at his side after facing the challenges of his illness for the last 20 months," said a statement released Monday evening by his publicist, Annett Wolf. No other details were given.

      Fans of the actor were saddened to learn in March 2008 that Swayze was suffering from a particularly deadly form of cancer.

      He had kept working despite the diagnosis, putting together a memoir with his wife and shooting "The Beast," an A&E drama series for which he had already made the pilot. It drew a respectable 1.3 million viewers when the 13 episodes ran on the cable television station in 2009, but A&E said it had reluctantly decided not to renew it for a second season.

      Swayze said he opted not to use painkilling drugs while making "The Beast" because they would have taken the edge off his performance. He acknowledged that time might be running out given the grim nature of the disease.

      When he first went public with the illness, some reports gave him only weeks to live, but his doctor said his situation was "considerably more optimistic" than that.

      "I'd say five years is pretty wishful thinking," Swayze told ABC's Barbara Walters in early 2009. "Two years seems likely if you're going to believe statistics. I want to last until they find a cure, which means I'd better get a fire under it."

      Swayze fought the disease publicly. Last year he appeared in a Stand Up to Cancer telethon, reports CBS Radio's Steve Futterman. In the last few months he condition began to worsen and it was clear the end was near. Swayze smoked cigarettes much of his life and said he felt smoking probably had something to do with his illness, Futterman reports.

      A three-time Golden Globe nominee, Swayze became a star with his performance as the misunderstood bad-boy Johnny Castle in "Dirty Dancing." As the son of a choreographer who began his career in musical theater, he seemed a natural to play the role.

      A coming-of-age romance starring Jennifer Grey as an idealistic young woman on vacation with her family and Swayze as the Catskills resort's sexy (and much older) dance instructor, the film made great use of both his grace on his feet and his muscular physique.

      It became an international phenomenon in the summer of 1987, spawning albums, an Oscar-winning hit song in "(I've Had) the Time of My Life," stage productions and a sequel, 2004's "Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights," in which he made a cameo.

      Swayze performed and co-wrote a song on the soundtrack, the ballad "She's Like the Wind," inspired by his wife, Lisa Niemi. The film also gave him the chance to utter the now-classic line, "Nobody puts Baby in a corner."

      And it allowed him to poke fun at himself on a "Saturday Night Live" episode, in which he played a would-be Chippendales exotic dancer alongside the corpulent — and frighteningly shirtless — Chris Farley.

      A major crowdpleaser, "Dirty Dancing" drew only mixed reviews from critics, though Vincent Canby wrote in The New York Times, "Given the limitations of his role, that of a poor but handsome sex-object abused by the rich women at Kellerman's Mountain House, Mr. Swayze is also good. ... He's at his best — as is the movie — when he's dancing."

      Swayze followed that up with the 1989 action film "Road House," in which he played a bouncer at a rowdy bar. But it was his performance in 1990's "Ghost" that showed his vulnerable, sensitive side. He starred as a murdered man trying to communicate with his fiancee (Demi Moore) — with great frustration and longing — through a psychic played by Whoopi Goldberg.

      Swayze said at the time that he fought for the role of Sam Wheat (director Jerry Zucker wanted Kevin Kline) but once he went in for an audition and read six scenes, he got it.

      Why did he want the part so badly? "It made me cry four or five times," he said of Bruce Joel Rubin's Oscar-winning script in an AP interview.

      "Ghost" provided yet another indelible musical moment: Swayze and Moore sensually molding pottery together to the strains of the Righteous Brothers' "Unchained Melody." It also earned a best-picture nomination and a supporting-actress Oscar for Goldberg, who said she wouldn't have won if it weren't for Swayze.

      "When I won my Academy Award, the only person I really thanked was Patrick," Goldberg said in March 2008 on the ABC daytime talk show "The View."

      Swayze himself earned three Golden Globe nominations, for "Dirty Dancing," "Ghost" and 1995's "To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar," which further allowed him to toy with his masculine image. The role called for him to play a drag queen on a cross-country road trip alongside Wesley Snipes and John Leguizamo.

      His heartthrob status almost kept him from being considered for the role of Vida Boheme.

      "I couldn't get seen on it because everyone viewed me as terminally heterosexually masculine-macho," he told the AP then. But he transformed himself so completely that when his screen test was sent to Steven Spielberg, whose Amblin pictures produced "To Wong Foo," Spielberg didn't recognize him.

      Critics said Swayze was erratic in his choice of roles, reports CBS Radio's Karyn Regal. He said true actors needed to take chances.

      Swayze also didn't want his head to swell over being declared People Magazine's "sexiest man alive" in 1991 - a title earned after his erotic pottery scene in "Ghost," Regal reports. But for many of his fans, that may be the image that lives on.

      Among his earlier films, Swayze was part of the star-studded lineup of up-and-comers in Francis Ford Coppola's 1983 adaptation of S.E. Hinton's novel "The Outsiders," alongside Rob Lowe, Tom Cruise, Matt Dillon, Ralph Macchio, Emilio Estevez and Diane Lane. Swayze played Darrel "Dary" Curtis, the oldest of three wayward brothers — and essentially the father figure — in a poor family in small-town Oklahoma.

      Other '80s films included "Red Dawn," "Grandview U.S.A." (for which he also provided choreography) and "Youngblood," once more with Lowe, as Canadian hockey teammates.

      In the '90s, he made such eclectic films as "Point Break" (1991), in which he played the leader of a band of bank-robbing surfers, and the family Western "Tall Tale" (1995), in which he starred as Pecos Bill. He appeared on the cover of People magazine as its "Sexiest Man Alive" in 1991, but his career tapered off toward the end of the 1990s, when he also had stay in rehab for alcohol abuse. In 2001, he appeared in the cult favorite "Donnie Darko," and in 2003 he returned to the New York stage with "Chicago"; 2006 found him in the musical "Guys and Dolls" in London.

      Swayze was born in 1952 in Houston, the son of Jesse Swayze and choreographer Patsy Swayze, whose films include "Urban Cowboy."

      He played football but also was drawn to dance and theater, performing with the Feld, Joffrey and Harkness Ballets and appearing on Broadway as Danny Zuko in "Grease." But he turned to acting in 1978 after a series of injuries.

      Within a couple years of moving to Los Angeles, he made his debut in the roller-disco movie "Skatetown, U.S.A." The eclectic cast included Scott Baio, Flip Wilson, Maureen McCormack and Billy Barty.

      Swayze had a couple of movies in the works when his diagnosis was announced, including the drama "Powder Blue," starring Jessica Biel, Forest Whitaker and his younger brother, Don, which was scheduled for release this year.

      Off-screen, he was an avid conservationist who was moved by his time in Africa to shine a light on "man's greed and absolute unwillingness to operate according to Mother Nature's laws," he told the AP in 2004.

      Swayze was married since 1975 to Niemi, a fellow dancer who took lessons with his mother; they met when he was 19 and she was 15. A licensed pilot, Niemi would fly her husband from Los Angeles to Northern California for treatment at Stanford University Medical Center, People magazine reported in a cover sto

      Weekly Address: Losing Insurance Can Happen to Anybody

      vendredi 11 septembre 2009

      Obama Tells Congress to Stop Bickering

      The President Tells Congress What He Wants Out of Health Care Overhaul, Takes Aim at Critics

      • Play CBS VideoVIDEOIn Full: Obama Health Care Address

        During a special full-length primetime broadcast, President Barack Obama addressed the U.S. Congress in order to tackle concerns over the ongoing legislation and debates over health care reform.

      • VIDEOWhat's Next For Health Care Reform?

        CBS News Director of Political Coverage Steve Chaggaris breaks down President Obama's health care address and explains what's next.

      • VIDEOObama: Time For Bickering Over

        During a special congressional address, Pres. Obama told members of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the time for "bickering" over health care reform should end.

      • President Obama addressed a joint session of Congress Wednesday night about health care reform.PHOTO

        President Obama addressed a joint session of Congress Wednesday night about health care reform. (AP)

      • SPECIAL REPORTHealth Care

        The latest news and analysis on the continuing battle over Barack Obama's health care reform plans.

      (CBS) Updated at 11:45 p.m. ET

      Speaking before a special joint session of Congress this evening, President Obama laid out to legislators and the American people his goals for health care reform -- goals that he says incorporate both Democratic and Republican ideas.

      After a tedious summer in which the dialogue surrounding health care reform spun out of the president's control, Mr. Obama gave his address tonight in an attempt to clarify his priorities and set the legislative process back on track.

      Health care reform, the president said, should meet three basic goals: more security and stability for those with health insurance, access to insurance for those who do not have it, and ways to slow the growth of health care costs. (Read the president's full remarks here.)

      "The time for bickering is over," Mr. Obama said. "Now is the season for action. Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together, and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do. Now is the time to deliver on health care."

      CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care

      The president told the Congress he continues to seek common ground -- but he issued a warning to opponents of his plan who have used lies and exaggerations to fight it.

      "My door is always open," he said. "But know this: I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it's better politics to kill this plan than improve it... If you misrepresent what's in the plan, we will call you out. And I will not accept the status quo as a solution. Not this time. Not now."

      Mr. Obama said Americans have grown nervous about reform because of misinformation. He alluded to claims from former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that his plan would establish "death panels."

      "The best example is the claim, made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens," he said. "Such a charge would be laughable if it weren’t so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple."

      The president also disputed claims that illegal immigrants would be covered under his plan, that federal dollars would be used to fund abortions, or that his plan amounts to a "government takeover" of health care.

      His comments elicited a rowdy response from the Congress, with South Carolina Republican Rep. Joe Wilson shouting "You lie!" after Mr. Obama said no illegal immigrants would be covered. (Watch Congress jeer the president during his speech.)

      Wilson later released a statement apologizing for his behavior.

      The president also spurred some laughter from the Congress when he said, "While there remain some significant details to be ironed out, I believe a broad consensus exists" on many aspects of reform.

      As for the most contentious issue, a government-sponsored health insurance plan, or "public option," the president said it "is only a means to that end - and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal" of ending insurance company abuses and making coverage affordable.

      He insisted, though, that it would be an effective means of keeping the private market in check, "the same way public colleges and universities provide additional choice and competition to students without in any way inhibiting a vibrant system of private colleges and universities." (Watch President Obama's remarks on the public option.)

      "It's worth noting that a strong majority of Americans still favor a public insurance option of the sort I've proposed tonight," Mr. Obama said. "But its impact shouldn't be exaggerated... It is only one part of my plan, and should not be used as a handy excuse for the usual Washington ideological battles."

      He stressed that a public option would be optional - with less than 5 percent of Americans estimated to sign up - and would be on a level playing field with private companies.

      CBS News' Chief Washington Correspondent Bob Schieffer said that Mr. Obama may have been signaling to Democrats that they should forgo the public option.

      "He was saying to the liberals in his own party, 'Look, we're not going to get this public, government-run insurance program that you're insisting on, but there are a lot of things that we can get done, very significant things," Schieffer said. "He is saying, 'Don't miss the forest for the trees here.'" (Watch more of Schieffer's analysis.)

      Mr. Obama said alternatives such as nonprofit cooperatives are worth exploring.

      "But I will not back down on the basic principle that if Americans can’t find affordable coverage, we will provide you with a choice," he said. "And I will make sure that no government bureaucrat or insurance company bureaucrat gets between you and the care that you need."

      Full CBSNews.com coverage of the president's speech on health care:

      Obama Tells Congress to Stop Bickering
      Full Video Full Transcript Speech Highlights
      GOP Response: "It's Time to Start Over"
      Marc Ambinder: Will Obama's Sales Job Work?
      Mark Knoller: Obama Willing to Compromise - Up to a Point
      Was Obama Clear on the Public Option?
      Ted Kennedy's Letter to Obama
      Rep. Wilson Swipes the Spotlight
      Analysis: The Road Ahead for Health Care

      The president noted that it has been nearly a century since the federal government first called for health care reform under former President Theodore Roosevelt.

      "I am not the first president to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last," he said.

      Mr. Obama said that the stalled debate has brought the country to a breaking point, with soaring health care costs burdening many Americans with extraordinary financial hardship.

      "These are not primarily people on welfare," he said. "These are middle-class Americans."

      The president said his proposals would cost around $900 billion over 10 years -- "less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration," he said.

      The president repeated his common mantra that under his plan, no one who currently has health insurance will be required to change their coverage or their doctor.

      "Let me repeat this: nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have," he said.

      The plan, Mr. Obama said, will prohibit insurance companies from denying consumers coverage because of pre-existing conditions. It will also prohibit rescission, the practice of dropping customers' coverage after they get sick, along with caps on coverage. It will limit out-of-pocket expenses. Insurance companies would be required to cover routine checkups and preventive care.

      "That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives," he said.

      The president argued for the creation of a health insurance exchange to keep people insured, even if they lose their job or decide to start a business. He also advocated a mandate for all Americans to acquire insurance and tax credits for those who cannot afford coverage. (Watch the president call for an individual mandate.)

      To prove he is serious about keeping his plan deficit neutral, the president called for a provision to require more spending cuts if the savings promised do not materialize.

      "Part of the reason I faced a trillion dollar deficit when I walked in the door of the White House is because too many initiatives over the last decade were not paid for - from the Iraq War to tax breaks for the wealthy," the president said to great applause from Democrats and some Republicans. "I will not make that same mistake with health care." (Watch President Obama talk about paying for his plan.)

      Taking aim at Republicans who have railed against potential Medicare cuts, Mr. Obama addressed seniors directly.

      "Don't pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut - especially since some of the same folks who are spreading these tall tales have fought against Medicare in the past," he said, "and just this year supported a budget that would have essentially turned Medicare into a privatized voucher program. That will never happen on my watch. I will protect Medicare."

      He said however, that reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid would pay for most of this plan, with the remainder of the costs covered by fees on drug and insurance companies.

      In the Republican response to President Obama's address, Rep. Charles Boustany criticized the president's plan to pare down Medicare costs.

      "It cuts Medicare by $500 billion, while doing virtually nothing to make the program better for our seniors," he said. (Read the Republican response to President Obama's speech.)

      Mr. Obama also acknowledged Republican support for medical malpractice reform. He said he is directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to move forward on a Bush administration initiative to test the issue.

      "I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I have talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs," he said.

      To cap off his nearly 5,500-word speech, the president evoked the spirit of health care reform champion Sen. Ted Kennedy. He said the senator sent him a letter that the president was instructed to open after Kennedy's death.

      "He expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform - 'that great unfinished business of our society,' he called it - would finally pass," Mr. Obama revealed. "'What we face,' he wrote, 'is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country.'" (Watch President Obama talk about the letter from Kennedy)

      Not the first, but the last

      Dear friends of Lyon's support committee --

      I just finished laying out my plan for health reform at a joint session of Congress. Now, I'm writing directly to you because what happens next is critical -- and I need your help.

      Change this big will not happen because I ask for it. It can only come when the nation demands it. Congress knows where I stand. Now they need to hear from you.

      Add your voice: Ask your representatives to support my plan for real health reform in 2009.

      The heart of my plan is simple: bring stability and security to Americans who already have health insurance, guarantee affordable coverage for those who don't, and rein in the cost of health care.

      Tonight, I offered a specific plan for how to make it happen. I incorporated the best ideas from Democrats and Republicans to create a plan that's bold, practical, and represents the broad consensus of the American people.

      We've come closer to real health reform in the last few months than we have in the last 60 years. But those who profit from the status quo -- and those who put partisan advantage above all else -- will fight us every inch of the way.

      We do not seek that fight, but we will not shrink from it. The stakes are too high to let scare tactics cloud the debate, or to allow partisan bickering to block the path. Your voice, right now, is essential.

      See my full plan and call on your representatives to support it:

      http://my.barackobama.com/SupportReform


      Ours is not the first generation to understand the dire need for health reform. And I am not the first president to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last.

      Thank you,

      President Barack Obama

      dimanche 6 septembre 2009

      Weekly Address: Labor Day and Fair Rewards for Hard Work

      Van Jones Resigns As White House Advisor

      (You Tube)
      Van Jones took a bullet for his boss.

      After more than a week of withering criticism for past comments, Jones has resigned as an advisor to the White House on green jobs.

      The White House announced the news in the early hours of Sunday morning. In a statement, Nancy Sutley, Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, thanked Jones "for his valuable contributions to the Council on Environmental Quality. Over the last six months he has been a strong voice for creating 21st century jobs that improve energy efficiency and utilize renewable resources. We appreciate his hard work and wish him the best moving forward."

      But Jones had turned into a political liability for President Obama after statements he made prior to joining the White House came to light. Last week Jones apologized for a six-year-old petition he signed, alleging government complicity in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He also issued an apology for recorded comments from a February public meeting where Jones referred to Republicans as "a**holes" for not supporting administration efforts.

      On Saturday, Jones came under more fire after Verum Serum posted an excerpt for an anti-war CD that Jones appeared in which also featured Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of shooting to death a Philadelphia police officer in 1981. But the case has turned into an international cause celebre with critics arguing that Jamal's death row sentence should be overturned.

      Whether that was the proverbial straw remains unclear but as conservative criticism ratcheted up, the White House did not go out of its way to defend Jones. On Friday, press secretary Robert Gibbs responded to questions by declaring that Jones "continues to work for the administration." He referred all other questions about Jones to the environmental council.

      In a statement, Jones, who had worked at the White House as special adviser for green jobs since March, acknowledged that he had become a lightning rod for criticism. With the administration's hands full trying to push through controversial legislation on health care and energy, Jones said that opponents of reform had decided to launch "a vicious smear campaign" against him.

      "They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide," he said. "I have been inundated with calls -- from across the political spectrum -- urging me to 'stay and fight.' But I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."


      Tags:
      Van Jones ,
      White House
      Topics:
      In The News

      jeudi 3 septembre 2009

      The real story of August

      Organizing for America
      Dear friends of Lyon's support committee --

      At the beginning of August, President Obama wrote to the OFA community to challenge us to work hard, break through the noise and give the American people a voice in the fight for health insurance reform.

      It wasn't easy: With Congress back home, special interests and partisan attack groups went into overdrive spreading lies, and the media seemed to broadcast any story of conflict or division they could find.

      But you accepted the President's challenge -- and delivered.

      See it for yourself: Check out the latest photos and stories from around the country.

      See more

      Our strategy for the month was simple: engage the millions of individuals who know we need change to fight the lies and tell the truth, build support for reform, and ensure that support is highly visible while members of Congress are home gauging public opinion. We continued our methodical, battle-tested approach of volunteers reaching out online and offline in every part of the country. We offered the facts, answered questions and engaged those who were ready to get involved.

      And the results were extraordinary. OFA supporters like you came together in an unprecedented way over the past four weeks -- and it couldn't have happened without the individual volunteers who make it all possible:
      • Folks like Rebecca E. in Santa Fe, New Mexico, who voted for the first time last year -- and collected more than 1,800 health care declarations this summer. Across the country, we've collected more than 1 million signatures in support of the President's core principles for health insurance reform.

      • Supporters like Nita L. in Longmont, Colorado, who organized hundreds of supporters in her town to come with her to talk with their member of Congress about how much this fight means to them. They were among the more than 70,000 folks who showed up at 350 town halls -- where supporters of reform at times outnumbered opponents by 10-1 -- and volunteers who made 65,000 trips to local congressional offices.

      • It's the people who made more than 100,000 calls to Congress to thank representatives fighting for change -- like Nancy T. in Hendersonville, North Carolina, who hosted a health care phone booth because, after her heart transplant, she knows that no American should have to choose between financial ruin and getting the care they need.

      • It's the 1,500 supporters who filled a local recreation center in Kansas City, Missouri, at a town hall meeting with Senator Claire McCaskill, and the 2,500 people who jammed the streets to hear from Senator Sherrod Brown in Ohio -- just two of the more than 4,000 events where folks gathered to show their support across all 50 states in August.
      All of these signatures, calls, office drop-bys, conversations, gatherings, and town hall meetings, all of the late nights, homemade signs, long hours in the sun, and tireless volunteers who make it happen -- totaling more than 1.5 million people who've taken part in this campaign for real reform -- it all adds up to one incredible movement for change.

      Check out the latest photos and stories from the field to see this movement in action:

      http://my.barackobama.com/ontheground

      As Congress returns to D.C. and we roll up our sleeves for the final push toward reform, we know the hardest work may yet lie ahead. The special interests and those in Congress who have pledged to oppose the President no matter what will stoop even lower in the weeks ahead.

      But you should never doubt that we face the coming challenges together, as part of something far larger than any of us alone -- and far stronger than the old broken politics that have preserved the status quo for long enough.

      Our strategy is working. We are going to win this thing. Americans will finally get the health insurance reform we all need.

      Thank you for making it possible,

      Mitch

      Mitch Stewart
      Director
      Organizing for America

      Obama to Address Congress Next Wednesday

      (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
      Updated 4:22 p.m. ET

      President Obama plans to address a joint session of Congress on Wednesday, Sept. 9th, a senior official tells CBS News.

      The time for Mr. Obama's speech, which is to focus on health care reform, is not known. The White House has not yet made a formal announcement about the address, though a confirmation is expected shortly.

      House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sent a letter formally inviting the president to give the address Wednesday afternoon.

      This will be the president's second address to Congress. His first came on the evening of Feb 24th, 2009, when he gave a speech on the economy.

      That speech ran nearly 52 minutes, reports CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller.

      The president has been criticized for being insufficiently specific about what he wants health care reform to look like. Though has offered details about the provisions he is seeking in a series of speeches in recent months, Mr. Obama has left it to Congress to work out the legislative language. A CBS News poll this week showed disenchantment with the president's handling of the issue.

      Yesterday, senior advisor David Axelrod said the president may become "more prescriptive" about what he wants from a health care bill, which the White House has asked Congress to produce by September 15th.

      The White House has been "taken aback by the ferocity of opposition to its health care plan as expressed to members of Congress of both parties during their town meetings last month with constituents," Knoller reports.

      The president arguably lost control of the health care debate amid the town halls and overheated rhetoric this summer, suggests CBS News political director Steve Chaggaris. Chaggaris said Mr. Obama is now seeking to reclaim his message about why health care reform is necessary and clarify what he wants.

      "By doing it in front of a joint session of Congress on prime time television only amplifies that message, not only to Americans but to members of Congress, especially senators, who remain bogged down in their efforts to move a bill forward," said Chaggaris.

      Members return from their summer recess on September 8th, the day before the planned address.

      Then-President Bill Clinton addressed a joint session of Congress on September 22, 1993 as part of his failed effort to reform health care.

      "Some people have said that it would be a miracle if we passed health care reform," he said then. "But, my fellow Americans, I believe we live in a time of great change when miracles do happen."

      mercredi 2 septembre 2009

      The media

      Organizing for America
      Dear friends of Lyon's support committee --

      Over the past few months, two things have become clear about the fight for health insurance reform:
        1. Our opponents will create and spread outrageous lies to try to stop President Obama from creating real change.
        2. We just can't count on the media to debunk them.
      As President Obama described recently:
      If somebody puts out misinformation... then the way the news report comes across is, "Today, such-and-such accused President Obama of putting forward death panels. The White House responded that that wasn't true." And then they go on to the next story. And what they don't say is, "In fact, it isn't true."
      So we'll need to double our own efforts to get the truth out. That means more organizers running door-to-door canvases and phone banks to educate our neighbors, more events to spread the word to Congress, and more ads on the air countering the smears. And we'll need the money to pay for it all. Can you chip in to help make it happen?
      Please donate


      There's no doubt that the facts are on our side. Real reform will bring down costs, create more choices -- including the choice of a public option -- and guarantee access to health care for all of us.

      But our opponents' frightening smears can be pretty convincing too -- IF folks don't know that they're false.

      Stepping in when the media fails is a daunting challenge -- but this community has already come together and accomplished feats no one thought was possible. We did it for last year's election, and we're already doing it again as Organizing for America. In the three short months since we launched our first organizing drive for health care reform, OFA volunteers have held more than 12,000 events in every part of the country to spread the truth about reform and the need for change.

      Together, we can prove that no lie, no matter how scary, is more powerful than an organized group of people determined to get out the truth.

      We'll all need to step up -- and right now that means chipping in to make sure we can keep organizing hard to spread the truth and pass real reform in 2009.

      Please donate today to get the truth out:

      https://donate.barackobama.com/MediaDonate

      Thanks,

      Mitch

      Mitch Stewart
      Director
      Organizing for America

      mardi 1 septembre 2009

      Obama Keeps Several Bush Picks in Top Jobs

      Analysis: Despite GOP Complaints Obama Is Radically Moving the Government Left, Some Major Appointments Have Been Republicans

      • Play CBS VideoVIDEOObama Keeps Bernanke at Fed

        Amid an ongoing worldwide fiscal crisis, President Obama says that he will nominate U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke to serve for a second term in that position. Chip Reid reports.

        • President Barack Obama announces he is keeping Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, to a second term, Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2009, during a news conference in Oak Bluffs, Mass.PHOTO

          President Barack Obama announces he is keeping Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, to a second term, Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2009, during a news conference in Oak Bluffs, Mass. (AP Photo/Stephan Savoia)

        • IN-DEPTHObama's Cabinet

          The latest names and status of posts within Obama's new administration.

        (AP) For all the Republican howling about Barack Obama radically steering the government to the left and leading the nation toward socialism, some of his major appointments are Republican men and women of the middle.

        In what may be the top two national posts in light of today's crises at home and abroad, Obama stuck with the picks of former President George W. Bush in reappointing Fed chief Ben Bernanke and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

        Bernanke last week was given another four-year term to preside over nothing less than saving the U.S. economy and then keeping it strong. He was appointed by Bush in 2006 after a short stint as chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisers. Gates was kept in his Pentagon post to wind down the war in Iraq and build up the one in Afghanistan.

        The loss of Sen. Ted Kennedy to brain cancer led to a chorus of laments about the dearth of politicians these days able to reach across party lines. While Obama has had little luck with the highly polarized Congress in building bipartisan support on legislation, he has reached out often to Republicans in filling major jobs.

        The notion that he is moving the government to the left "is laughable, it's utterly laughable," said Thomas E. Mann, a government scholar at the Brookings Institution. Mann said the decision to keep Bernanke and Gates "doesn't buy him a thing with Republicans but was a sign of good judgment in both cases" because Bernanke and Gates were doing good jobs.

        Obama's larger problem is that he still does not have his own people in a majority of the government's top policymaking positions requiring Senate confirmation. But those he has put in top positions include a number of Republicans or nontraditional Democrats.

        Along with Gates and Bernanke, they include:

        Sheila Bair as holdover chairwoman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. She has played a major role in the management of the financial crisis. A one-time unsuccessful candidate for a Kansas House of Representatives seat, Bair was appointed by Bush in June 2006. Forbes Magazine ranks her as the second most powerful woman in the world behind German chancellor Angela Merkel.

        Ray LaHood, a former congressman from Illinois, as transportation secretary. He was elected as part of the "Gingrich Revolution" by Republicans in 1994's elections and was so trusted by both Republicans and Democrats that he was selected to preside over the House during the impeachment vote against President Bill Clinton.

        Former Rep. John McHugh from upstate New York, as Army secretary. McHugh was known by his House colleagues for an even temperament and willingness to work with Democrats.

        Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who was a Mormon missionary in China in his youth, as ambassador to China.

        Francis Collins, an evangelical Christian, as director of the National Institutes of Health.

        Unlike the others on the list, Collins is not a Republican and worked in the Obama presidential campaign. But he does not fit the usual mold of liberal Democrat as portrayed by many Republicans.

        Collins discussed his religious views in a 2006 book. Although some questions have been raised about whether he could keep his religious views separate from his work, the physician-geneticist is well respected in his field for landmark discoveries of disease genes and as head of the Human Genome Project.

        Meanwhile, Obama has been contending with an angry left in his own Democratic Party who are upset at him for not insisting more forcefully on a government-run health insurance option and for his decisions to retain some Bush-era counterterror policies.

        "The effort to portray Obama as dangerously leftist just doesn't have any traction," said Stephen Cimbala, a political science professor at Pennsylvania State University. "I think if they want to pick up seats in 2010 and get back up off the floor where Bush left them, they're going to have to find a way to go beyond the very narrow core Republican base and reach out to moderates. The case they have to make against Obama is a case about competency and performance. Not about ideology."

        Republicans are going all out on the warpath, especially on health care overhaul and budget issues.

        "Obama and his liberal congressional allies want to saddle taxpayers with even more debt through their government-run health care experiment that will cost trillions of dollars," said Republican party chief Michael Steele. House Minority Leader John Boehner accused Obama of a management style that is "not leadership; it's negligence." Republican Sen. Mike Enzi said in Saturday's Republican video and Internet address that Obama's Democrats favor "cutting hundreds of billions of dollars from the elderly to create new government programs."

        In asking Bernanke to stay on, Bush praised the former Princeton economist for "his calm and wisdom" in steering the economy through the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

        At the time he announced he was sticking with Gates at the Pentagon, Obama said he didn't ask the member of the Bush war cabinet to remain because of his party affiliation but because he felt he could best "serve the interests of the American people." Obama said he was "going to be welcoming a vigorous debate inside the White House."

        Meanwhile, Obama returned from his vacation in Massachusetts on Martha's Vineyard and, after a few days at the Camp David presidential retreat north of Washington, will increase his efforts "toward getting a bipartisan result" on health care overhaul, said deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton. "After he gets a little time to recharge his batteries ... he's going to come back as rip-roaring as he was before," Burton said.


        © MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

        lundi 31 août 2009

        Cheney Offers Sharp Defense of C.I.A. Interrogation Tactics


        Published: August 30, 2009

        WASHINGTON — Former Vice President Dick Cheney on Sunday sharply criticized the Obama administration’s decision to investigate the abuse of prisoners held by the Central Intelligence Agency as he delivered a forceful defense of the full range of interrogation techniques used by intelligence officers.

        Blog

        The Caucus
        The Caucus

        The latest on President Obama, the new administration and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.

        Readers' Comments

        Share your thoughts.

        Broadcast just six days after Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. appointed a federal prosecutor to examine the abuse of detainees, Mr. Cheney described the use of waterboardingand other coercive methods — including threatening detainees with a gun and a drill — as legal and crucial elements of the counterterrorism war.

        “I knew about the waterboarding, not specifically in any one particular case, but as a general policy that we had approved,” said Mr. Cheney, who noted that neither a gun nor a drill had actually been used on detainees. “The fact of the matter is the Justice Department reviewed all those allegations several years ago.”

        “The judgment was made then that there wasn’t anything that was improper or illegal,” said Mr. Cheney, who was speaking in an interview on Fox News Sunday.

        Mr. Cheney said he also supported officers who strayed outside Justice Department rules and used unauthorized interrogation techniques, saying they did so to keep Americans safe. And he warned that Mr. Holder’s investigation would demoralize intelligence officers and discourage them from working aggressively to protect the nation.

        Mr. Cheney described the inquiry as an “intensely partisan, politicized look back at the prior administration” intended to placate the left wing of the Democratic Party. “It’s clearly a political move,” he said. “I mean, there’s no other rationale for why they’re doing this.”

        In naming the prosecutor last week, Mr. Holder said he had no choice but to move forward with the investigation after the Justice Department’s ethics office recommended a new review of several interrogation cases and he reviewed a 2004 report on the interrogation program by the C.I.A. inspector general that was released Monday under a court order.

        The report described a variety of abuses, including suggestions about sexually assaulting a detainee’s relatives and staging mock executions as well as the accounts of one prisoner who was repeatedly knocked out with pressure applied to his carotid artery and another who was lifted off the grounds by his arms, which were tied behind his back.

        Obama administration officials denied on Sunday that the inquiry was politically motivated. One administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the attorney general “makes decisions with independence from the White House based on the facts and the law.”

        Mr. Cheney’s vigorous remarks demonstrated his determination to embrace his new role as a fiery defender of the Bush administration policies. But some of his concerns are already reverberating within the Obama administration as officials debate whether the investigation will undercut the work of the C.I.A. or serve as a critical step toward exposing and possibly prosecuting grave acts of wrongdoing that have damaged the nation’s standing abroad.

        Officials in the C.I.A. and the Justice Department remain sharply divided about Mr. Holder’s decision to appoint a federal prosecutor to determine if a full criminal investigation into the conduct of agency employees or contractors is needed. On Sunday, it became clear that such concerns were also emerging among some Democrats in Congress.

        Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who is the chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee, said she remained ambivalent about the wisdom of the inquiry, which will be led by John H. Durham, a prosecutor from Connecticut who has been investigating the C.I.A.’s destruction of interrogation videotapes.

        Mrs. Feinstein said she had read the full inspector general’s report. “I was horrified, so I understand the attorney general’s reaction,” she said.

        But, speaking on “Face the Nation” on CBS, she warned that “the timing of this is not very good.” She said that her committee was nearing completion of a bipartisan study of interrogation and detention practices and that it should have been allowed to complete its work before a decision was made about an investigation.

        Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who leads the Foreign Relations Committee, defended the Obama administration, saying the president had been careful to balance the nation’s national security interests with the need to investigate potential wrongdoing.

        In April, Mr. Obama left open the possibility that C.I.A. officers who acted without legal authorization could still face criminal penalties, but he emphasized that those acting on the Justice Department’s legal advice would not be prosecuted, a point Mr. Holder reiterated last week.

        “I think the president himself has been unbelievably bending in the direction of trying to be careful about what happens to national security, protecting our national security interests, being very sensitive about the C.I.A.’s prerogatives and needs and so forth,” Mr. Kerry said Sunday in an interview on “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on ABC.

        Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, also defended Mr. Holder’s authority to call for an investigation, though he said on Sunday that it was a mistake that might harm agency morale and effectiveness.

        Mr. McCain challenged Mr. Cheney’s argument that the C.I.A.’s use of extreme interrogation methods had provided critical, life-saving intelligence. He said such techniques violated the Geneva Convention on torture, damaged United States relations with allies, substantially aided Al Qaeda with its recruitment and produced unreliable intelligence.

        “I think it harmed our image in the world,” Mr. McCain said on “Face the Nation” on CBS. “But for us now to go back, I think, would be a serious mistake.”

        Mr. Cheney said on Sunday that he supported even those agents who used harsh interrogation techniques that were unauthorized by the Justice Department. “I think they were directly responsible for the fact that for eight years we had no further mass casualty attacks against the United States,” he said.

        “We ask these people to do some very difficult things,” Mr. Cheney said. “They do so at the direction of the president.” He added: “In this case, we had the specific legal authority of the Justice Department. And if they’re now going to be subject to being investigated and prosecuted by the next administration, nobody’s going to sign up for those kinds of missions.”

        Responding to questions about the Bush administration’s Iran policy, Mr. Cheney also said he was “a bigger advocate of military action” against that country’s nuclear infrastructure than any of his colleagues. He said that was an argument that he obviously lost when President George W. Bush decided in favor of pursuing diplomatic avenues.

        “I think it was very important that the military option be on the table,” Mr. Cheney said. “I thought that negotiations couldn’t possibly succeed unless the Iranians really believed we were prepared to use military force.”

        Scott Shane contributed reporting.

        dimanche 30 août 2009

        Kennedy Laid to Rest at Arlington

        WASHINGTON, D.C., Aug. 29, 2009

        Senator Remembered for the "Dream He Kept Alive" During Decades Since Brothers' Deaths

          • Senator Edward Kennedy's casket is shown during a burial at Arlington National Cemetery, Aug. 29, 2009.PHOTO

            Senator Edward Kennedy's casket is shown during a burial at Arlington National Cemetery, Aug. 29, 2009. (AP)

          Previous slideNext slide
          • 0
          • 1